Philip
Ridley’s new play is yet another nimble body swerve for this wonderful
playwright. He started his professional theatre work with the ‘East End
Gothic’ of The Pitchfork Disney, The Fastest Clock in the Universe, and Ghost from a Perfect Place;
he then began developing the storytelling sequence, a large number of
plays for young audiences and adults centred on acts of storytelling
that reconstruct memories, identities, civilisations. In the 2000s his
plays became somewhat more realistic in tone; I say somewhat to indicate
that the characters now have recognisable names and the locations are
more explicitly identified. Plays like Vincent River, Leaves of Glass, Piranha Heights and Mercury Fur still burst with gothic horror, explosions of poetic language and a baroque, shifting sexuality.
And now he’s gone in a new direction. Tender Napalm centres
on two characters, named only as ‘Man’ and ‘Woman’. It’s another
storytelling play; the two characters flirt with each other, challenge
each other, insult and imaginatively murder each other; they tell
stories of battles enacted on a ruined island; they tell heroic deeds of
daring and they boast, brag, mock and taunt. But there’s no location
indicated. It’s a play of sheer performance. Two chairs in this
production and an athletic physicality from the two performers.
What becomes steadily clear through the
course of the play is that these stories have been their way of dealing
with a traumatic loss, the death of a child in a bombing. The
imaginative landscape becomes gradually understood as the traumatised
landscape of grief. The island shattered by a tsunami is the life
stripped and barren by loss. The Man’s long story of being kidnapped by
pacific aliens and forced to wage their war for them is the extension of
a desire for revenge against his daughter’s killers. And finally we see
their first meeting; she was invited as friend of a friend to an
eighteenth birthday party; he was the sister of the birthday girl, the
lavish party being paid for by their mother and dying father. Images
from that party are lodged in the fantasy stories like shrapnel from a
bomb blast.
Ridley’s writing is both sophisticated
and naive. It has, at times, a genuinely childlike quality that is full
of unabashed big descriptive phrases. At one point the Man is swallowed
by a giant serpent and he starts to hack his way up through the stomach
wall towards the heart: ‘It’s like digging a hole in a sky made of
meat,’ he says ravishingly. (I remember the first time I saw The Pitchfork Disney
and falling in love with the writing as Haley described fleeing from a
pack of the dogs by entering a church and climbing the vast crucifix: ‘I
scarpered higher, wrapped my legs round the waist of our Saviour, clung
onto the crown of thorns for all I was worth’). And then there are
moments of extreme sexual violence, as when they imagine inserting a
grenade into each other’s cunts and arses.
The Pitchfork Disney emerged from two durational monologues that Ridley performed at art college: one as someone afraid of everything and another as someone afraid of nothing. Bringing the two together then meant building a set and character around these opposed forces. Here he doesn’t need to do any more than bring these two, mirrored forces of love and resentment, desire and regret, nostalgia and trauma. It is a quite breathtaking experience, staged simply and rightly, and embodied with sweaty, muscular passion by Jack Gordon and Vinette Robinson. It makes me hungry for Ridley’s next play.